Sweepstakes Casino Controversy – And Celebrities’ All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday’s hearing on prohibited gambling.

No, they weren’t personally in presence, but the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos – the controversial sites offering both complimentary casino-style games and profitable rewards, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can ‘play for totally free,’ while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of many gaming corporations, not to mention suit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as standard casinos, only without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, however sweepstakes operators aren’t based on regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the company faces accusations of illegal sports betting in a New york city claim that claims VGW uses star endorsers to ‘develop a veneer of authenticity’ around its product. (See VGW’s declaration listed below)

‘I’m unsure” if you don’t trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton” is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,’ Friday’s presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a series of stars from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George – none of whom offer any differences in between standard gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of many sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where many – however not all – video games are free

Drake has a handle social sweeps casino, Stake, that he routinely promotes on social networks

Read More

Donald Trump ‘set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy’

Instead, advertisements generally center around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while omitting the capacity for actual sports betting losses.

Others tempt consumers with of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad flaunting Drake’s cars and trucks, aircrafts and mansions before rotating to video footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

‘Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?’ read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: ‘Because I never quit.’

The inconsistency between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, but operators of the latter insist they’re not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for complimentary.

‘Most social sweeps clients never ever purchase,’ the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. ‘The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the typical deposit or bet size at real-money online gambling sites.’

Social casinos provide consumers a possibility to play casino-style video games with pals. Players have the option to buy worthless currency typically described as ‘gold coins,’ which can not be exchanged for real cash, but can be used to open numerous features within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, enabling consumers to obtain other currency called ‘sweeps coins’ that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers’ Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement flaunting Drake’s automobiles, aircrafts and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW’s Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7 states, which has actually helped to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which don’t require typically need identification. However, sites like Chumba will request for IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow clients to submit mail-in requests for complimentary sweeps coins, provided the players follow painfully specific directions. What’s more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins just for registering, thus providing them a reason to try their hands at any number of gambling establishment video games for a chance to win – or lose – genuine money.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to run in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a means of promoting their support.

‘Social sweepstakes video games are just a form of online home entertainment,’ an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. ‘No purchase is required to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever need to pay for an opportunity to win rewards. That lack of a purchase requirement – or” consideration” – is an essential difference between social sweeps and standard online gambling websites like gambling establishments.’

Think of the manner in which McDonald’s uses its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren’t paying to gamble, but rather they’re buying hamburgers and fries that use them the possibility to win rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or ‘consideration’, the game itself doesn’t satisfy the definition of gambling in the US.

‘Sweepstakes are a long-standing approach for promoting all type of daily services in the United States, everything from hamburgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement stores,’ the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. ‘Sweepstakes promos are routinely used by a who’s who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.’

But to lots of sports betting industry insiders, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald’s Monopoly game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct beginning and end, therefore recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant’s main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote genuine items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

‘They don’t last permanently and they’re normally not tied to casino-style video games of opportunity,’ Wallach told DailyMail.com. ‘They’re just cash free gifts.

‘The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the qualities frequently related to McDonald’s-style sweepstakes promos,’ Wallach continued. ‘Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos provide” casino-like” payouts, typically 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the typical payment portion for a temporary advertising sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the income made by the business [normally less than one percent]’

Wallach is fast to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that emerged in Florida, offering clients the possibility to play casino-style games for genuine rewards. A number of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually because been shuttered over accusations of prohibited gambling.

DJ Khaled is among several celeb spokespeople for VGW’s Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments should deal with comparable examination.

‘These differences are not approximate,’ Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. ‘They have actually consistently been cited by courts and state attorney general of the United States as essential elements in identifying that a sweepstakes promo remained in truth a guise for illegal sports betting.’

One of the casino market’s leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact new legislation on the problem.

‘Consumers are being deprived of defenses and states are giving up substantial tax and earnings opportunities as this gaming changes that performed through managed channels,’ read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have taken legal action against social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 different cases in Kentucky without confessing any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the newest lawsuit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New York state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an ‘prohibited sports betting enterprise. ‘

Apple and Google have actually likewise been called as defendants in claims for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com’s demand for comment.

‘We generally do not discuss matters before the courts,’ a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com through email. ‘However, we keep in mind that this claim has only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been officially served.

‘We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we operate, and stay positive about the future,’ the spokesperson continued. ‘We continue to provide our free-to-play games throughout most of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, developing not only great video games, user experiences and home entertainment, but also ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the highest level of requirements.

‘More broadly, we ‘d repeat that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively common across the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to vigorously defend any claim which might be brought versus us.’

The problems between traditional online gaming and sweepstakes casinos might show problematic for some star endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers’ George both endorse VGW’s Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with conventional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

‘It’s ironic that professional athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting wagering ‘sweeps’ websites while at the same time the leagues wish to project a strong stance against prohibited sports betting – especially when attempting to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,’ Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter’s scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably unlawful sports betting sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major problem for leagues such as the NBA.

‘I ‘d expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,’ Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the gamers’ agents reacted to DailyMail.com’s requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also disregarded to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to explain to customers the differences and similarities between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

‘We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,’ the spokesperson said. ‘A few of our worths are” our gamers come initially” and” we do what’s right”, and we put our values at the core of everything we do.’

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

‘Celebrities who provide their names to dubious prohibited gaming sites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at danger as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare harm,’ Glaser stated. ‘There is likewise some threat that state regulators and state lawyers basic rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in illegal sports betting.’

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton